On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 01:28:22PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Seth Forshee <seth.forshee at canonical.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 02:57:42PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > >> Hi Seth, > >> > >> This is v3 of my TW/US 5GHz updates series. Sorry for the long delay. > >> > >> Changes since v2: > >> > >> - Moved the US U-NII-1 (5150 ~ 5250 MHz) patch in front of the TW patch > >> > >> - Drop U-NII-1 power limit from 24 dBm to 23 dBm, to be on the safe > >> side of 250mW > >> > >> > >> Patch 1 updates the 5470 ~ 5725 MHz rules for Taiwan, specifically > >> the opening up of 5600 ~ 5650 MHz spectrum previously allocated to > >> weather radars. The transmission power limit is also corrected to > >> match the regulations. > >> > >> Patch 2 changes the boundary frequencies for each rule for Taiwan to > >> match the frequency allocation table. The "regulation" database shouldn't > >> care about artificial channel boundaries. > >> > >> Patch 3 updates the transmission power limits for 5150 ~ 5250 MHz for > >> the US. > >> > >> Patch 4 adds the previously unusable 5150 ~ 5250 MHz band for Taiwan. > >> > >> Patch 5 updates the transmission power limits for Taiwan, per the NCC's > >> official reply. This patch may be slightly controversial, as there is > >> no official English document. Either someone will have to independently > >> verify this, or translate the Chinese document. > > > > This description doesn't quite match the patches. Patch 4 both adds the > > 5150-5250 MHz band and increases the power limits for 5250-5350 MHz, > > whereas patch 5 changes the DFS master region to DFS-FCC. Previously the > > increased power limit for 5250-5350 MHz was part of patch 5 - perhaps > > you accidentally moved that part to patch 4 when you were updating the > > patches? > > Indeed. I squashed a fixup into the wrong patch, and tried to fix it. > Obviously that didn't work out so well. > > > So patches 1-3 look fine to me. I suspect you'll want to move the power > > limit increase from patch 4 to 5. I'm also going to take a look at a > > machine translation of the Chinese document, and if that looks to be in > > agreement with your patches then I should be able to apply them next > > week sometime. > > Do you want me to send a new version now, or wait for you to go through > the translation first? I've taken a look at the translation, and as far as I can tell what you've done looks okay. So go ahead and resend, and as long as no one else finds a problem I'll apply all 5. Thanks, Seth
