Thanks for the reply. I'll fix the format and re-submit. On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Seth Forshee <seth.forshee at canonical.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:44:09PM -0700, Wei Zhong wrote: >> commit 2fef4cad8a1bd9cbbf178e59a1b3ca672b057095 >> Author: Wei Zhong <wzhong at google.com> >> Date: Wed Jul 1 22:39:09 2015 -0700 >> >> wireless-regdb: update CA rules for 5600 - 5650 mHz >> >> Related regulation: >> http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/sf10971.html#s6.2.3 >> >> Frequency Bands 5470-5600 MHz and 5650-5725 MHz >> Until further notice, devices subject to this section [i.e. Wifi device >> supporting 5 GHz bands] shall not be capable of transmitting in the band >> 5600-5650 MHz. This restriction is for the protection of Environment >> Canada?s weather radars operating in this band. > > Thanks for the patch. There are a couple of issues though, plus a > question. > > First, this project requires that you add a Signed-off-by tag to the > commit message to acknowledge your agreement to the Developer > Certificate of Origin. Please see the CONTRIBUTING file for more > information. > > Second, the patch is not in the correct format. It looks like to me you > pasted the output from git-show, which resulted in mangled white space > and other issues. Please use git-format-patch to create the patch, then > send it using git-send-email or else send the patch as an attachment. > >> diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt >> index 809cd3c..da0cfad 100644 >> --- a/db.txt >> +++ b/db.txt >> @@ -216,7 +216,8 @@ country CA: DFS-FCC >> (2402 - 2472 @ 40), (30) >> (5170 - 5250 @ 80), (17), AUTO-BW >> (5250 - 5330 @ 80), (24), DFS, AUTO-BW >> - (5490 - 5730 @ 160), (24), DFS >> + (5490 - 5600 @ 80), (24), DFS >> + (5650 - 5730 @ 40), (24), DFS > > Why isn't 80MHz channel bandwidth allowed in the 5650-5730 range? It could. But since the entire band is only 80 MHz, in practice, not a single center_freq, channel 136 or140 for example, can utilities 80 MHz, right? > > Thanks, > Seth
