Hi Seth, Thanks for the prompt reply! > This looks reasonable based on the documentation you linked to. I'm not > certain about the EIRP values, but that's at least consistent with what > was there before (i.e. they match the EIRP for the first DFS frequency > range). > I'm going to wait a bit to see if anyone has any comments about the > patch, and if no one objects I'll apply it. Indeed, I didn't know the EIRP values so I put them back to what they were set to by QCA. Jouni, I hope you can shed some light on where these values come from. Thanks, Daiwei On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Seth Forshee <seth.forshee at canonical.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 07:42:12PM -0800, Daiwei Li wrote: >> Hello, >> >> We've found that our devices can't seem to operate on certain >> frequencies (e.g. 5660MHz) being used by access points like the Apple >> Airport Extreme and Asus RT-AC68U. I did a git bisect and found that >> 31dc1c5eca29d039ac8f26340defe44bd7e497c1 removed that band amongst >> others. A more recent [1] FCC source implies that these frequencies >> should be usable with DFS. >> >> Does anyone know the source for the commit that removed these frequencies from? > > The patch came from QCA. I'm adding Jouni to the Cc. Jouni, any > comments? > >> Below is a patch that adds back these frequencies: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> wireless-regdb: Add back regulatory rules for US >> >> The FCC approved UNII devices operating in the >> 5470 - 5725MHz range with radar detection and DFS >> capabilities. See the [1] source for details. >> >> [1] https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/kdb/forms/FTSSearchResultPage.cfm?id=41732&switch=P >> >> Signed-off-by: Daiwei Li <daiweili at suitabletech.com> > > This looks reasonable based on the documentation you linked to. I'm not > certain about the EIRP values, but that's at least consistent with what > was there before (i.e. they match the EIRP for the first DFS frequency > range). > > I'm going to wait a bit to see if anyone has any comments about the > patch, and if no one objects I'll apply it. > > Thanks, > Seth
