On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 11:23 -0500, Seth Forshee wrote: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 05:31:14PM +0200, Jean-Pierre Tosoni wrote: > > A really weird patch that splits the U-NII-2e band into 1, 2 or 3 > > sub-bands to enforce a CAC time of 10 minutes in the range 5600-5650 MHz. > > Wrong maintainer / list. CRDA patches should be directed to Luis and the > linux-wireless list (feel free to Cc wireless-regdb if you like). However, I'm not convinced that this actually *belongs* into the crda code? That seems like the wrong approach - shouldn't these rules be captured in the database? We do have AUTO-BW now so it should be possible, no? And if the timings aren't captured in the db.txt file they really should be. johannes
