On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 12:21 +0200, Ilan Peer wrote: > It is assumed that such restrictions are enforced by user space. > Furthermore, it is assumed, that if the conditions that allowed for > the operation of the GO on such a channel change, i.e., the station > interface disconnected from the AP, it is the responsibility of user > space to evacuate the GO from the channel. For the latter here, don't we need some sort of flag with userspace saying "trust me, I know what I'm doing"? Or put another way - how does this not make us break compliance when running with old versions of wpa_supplicant? johannes
