On 02/06/2013 08:25 PM, John W. Linville wrote: > Thank you so much for this timely message! I apologize for having > overlooked it so far. > > I don't suppose that you could translate the information you have > provided into the format used within the regulatory database file? > Also, could you provide a link to the original regulatory document > (even if it is in Serbian)? Serbia is under ETSI/CEPT rules( ECC/DEC/(04)08 ), see summary[1]: 5 GHz current rules are too much liberal and incomplete: country RS: (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW) (5150 - 5350 @ 40), (N/A, 200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR (5470 - 5725 @ 20), (3, 1000 mW), DFS # 60 gHz band channels 1-4, ref: Etsi En 302 567 (57240 - 65880 @ 2160), (N/A, 40), NO-OUTDOOR They should be changed to "standard" ETSI rules: (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW) (5150 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR (5250 - 5350 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS (5470 - 5725 @ 40), (N/A, 500 mW), DFS # 60 gHz band channels 1-4, ref: Etsi En 302 567 (57240 - 65880 @ 2160), (N/A, 40), NO-OUTDOOR http://www.erodocdb.dk/doks/implement_doc_adm.aspx?docid=2033 http://www.erodocdb.dk/doks/implement_adm_doc.aspx?ITUID=48&ITUSHORT=RS&ITULONG=Serbia Contact point for implementation status: Ms Jelena Surculija <jelena.surculija at mtid.gov.rs> Dr Milan Jankovic <milan.jankovic at ratel.org.rs> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-June/000058.html
