On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez at gmail.com> wrote: > On 07/03/2012 11:25 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: >> >> Spanish law was based on CEPT/EU rules: >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-June/000058.html >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/2012-June/000059.html >> >> >> Orden ITC/332/2010, de 12 de febrero, por la que se aprueba el cuadro >> nacional de atribuci?n de frecuencias (CNAF): >> https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2010-2719 >> https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2010/02/19/pdfs/BOE-A-2010-2719.pdf >> >> search for: >> UN - 85 RLANs y datos en 2400 a 2483,5 MHz (pag. 213) >> UN ? 128 RLANs en 5 GHz (pag. 232) >> >> more info at "Cuadro nacional de atribuci?n de frecuencias (CNAF)": >> http://www.minetur.gob.es/telecomunicaciones/espectro/paginas/cnaf.aspx >> >> --- >> db.txt | 8 ++++---- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt >> index 4c54543..11409d6 100644 >> --- a/db.txt >> +++ b/db.txt >> @@ -239,10 +239,10 @@ country EG: >> (5250 - 5330 @ 20), (N/A, 20), DFS >> >> country ES: DFS-ETSI >> - (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (N/A, 20) >> - (5170 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 20) >> - (5250 - 5330 @ 40), (N/A, 20), DFS >> - (5490 - 5710 @ 40), (N/A, 27), DFS >> + (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW) >> + (5150 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR >> + (5250 - 5350 @ 40), (N/A, 100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS >> + (5470 - 5725 @ 40), (N/A, 500 mW), DFS >> >> country FI: DFS-ETSI >> (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (N/A, 20) >> > > Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez at gmail.com> Please send a new patch and if you are going to convert something form dBm to mW then please do that in *one* single patch so that it can easily be read what changes you are *actually* making. That is one patch to make a conversion in units that will not make any actual changes, and then send another patch with all the verbiage you can use to explain *why* you want the change you are making. You want the commit log to have enough language so that if I forward the patch to a regulatory person who has never read a patch they can read it. The agreed upon "bar" for quality of regulatory patches was agreed upon a while ago, for details see: http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=128414096127554&w=2 The more information you can provide the better. Luis
