There is really a little chance in this case. English translation is absent for the referenced docs and I emailed UCRF several months ago regarding terminology clarifications but got no response. Maybe there are more chances with traditional mail or personal visit but I'd not put a lot on that. Regarding 2nd and 3rd cases I have no real assumptions at all. Anyway, it would be better to know John's opinion by himself here. 2012/12/6 Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka at redhat.com>: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 11:27:55PM +0100, Mykyta Iziumtsev wrote: >> Add 5GHz band and mark 2.4GHz and 5GHz as NO-OUTDOOR according to >> "??????? ??? ???????????? ???????? ???????????????? ??????? >> ?? ???????????????? ?????????, ??? ???????????? ???? ?? ???????? >> ??????? ?? ????????????" from 27 May 2010. >> >> Ref: >> * #914 / 06 Sep 2007: http://www.ucrf.gov.ua/uk/doc/nkrz/1196068874 >> * #1174 / 23 Oct 2008: http://www.nkrz.gov.ua/uk/activities/ruling/1225269361 >> (appendix 8) > > Since regulatory maintainer does not understand Ukrainian, > there is little chance to get this patch applied. > > IMHO this can be solved by: > > * having official English translation of those document on gov.ua site > * provide patch by wlan chip vendor, confirmed by legal deparament of > the vendor > * provide patch by some known Ukrainian kernel developer, someone > who is know by regulatory maintainer and can be trust > > Stanislaw
