On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 00:02 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg at intel.com> > > The 10 MHz rules overlap completely with other rules, > so the kernel implementation will simply continue > searching when it finds them as it looks for at least > 20 MHz. But even if it were to look for less it would > still be allowed either way. Not true, it won't skip them ... my bad. > country JP: > (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (N/A, 20) > (2474 - 2494 @ 20), (N/A, 20), NO-OFDM > - (4910 - 4930 @ 10), (N/A, 23) > (4910 - 4990 @ 40), (N/A, 23) This @10 rule will in fact prevent channel 184 from getting used together with HT40. It won't prevent anyone from using channel 184 as a 20 MHz channel because the kernel doesn't check the bandwidth for 20 MHz channels at all.... (!) > (4910 - 4990 @ 40), (N/A, 23) > - (4930 - 4950 @ 10), (N/A, 23) > - (5030 - 5045 @ 10), (N/A, 23) > (5030 - 5090 @ 40), (N/A, 23) > - (5050 - 5060 @ 10), (N/A, 23) These are in fact useless since they come *after* wider rules that totally contain them, so they can't have any effect. johannes
