On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 21:02 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 20:14 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg at intel.com> > > > > The kernel uses the bandwidth this way: any frequency > > rule that is required for any of the 20 MHz subchannels > > of a given channel must allow the total bandwidth. > > Therefore, this check is wrong -- a frequency rule may > > need to be specified with higher bandwidth than it has > > to allow to form e.g. HT40 out of subchannels. > > This patch, and the other patch, are because we currently interpret the > rules this way: > > http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/files/chans-old.pdf Let me attach that for the archives ... johannes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: chans-old.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 21679 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/wireless-regdb/attachments/20121204/d15304c0/attachment-0001.pdf>
