On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:54 AM, oiaohm <wineforum-user@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > ALSA lib pcm_pulse.c:1008:(_snd_pcm_pulse_open) Unknown field > > handle_underrun > > > This is why. output streem will have failed to open because of that. > > So its the "multimedia-git" where this is coming from. People developer > branches for testing out future forms has some nasty requirements. Like the > git version of pulseaudio as well. That supports the handle_under-run > feature. > > Emulation is the required state to use pulseaudio if you have a working > version of it. > > MacNean Tyrrell basically nice sweet spot wine has to ask for that feature > since windows applications believe it perfectly fine to under run a audio > buffer. > Why is wine requesting the feature. It stops wine from crashing the > complete pulseaudio server due to it not handling underruns. > > Yes its better to be pulseaudio incompadible until it underrun in it get > more common. > > > > > > I dont' think I'm understanding you well. I have set it to emulation, does 1.3.27 non multimedia git work with no sound lag? 1 reason I love the wine-pulse patch for previous wines was no sound lag at all, anytime I chose alsa/emulation I got sound lag. I haven't tested alsa in a long time on regular wine. Maybe I'll compile a fresh 1.3.27 and test it. So are you saying future versions of wine/pulseaudio will allow them to work hand in hand without patches/emulation/etc? -- Sincerely, MacNean C. Tyrrell -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-users/attachments/20110831/2ed91764/attachment.htm>