jjmckenzie wrote: > On 5/28/11, SpawnHappyJake <wineforum-user@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Shoot. I was hopeful for that one. Did you do his instructions exactly? He > > said to use at least version 1.1.39. Do you think there has been a > > regression since then? The latest stable is supposed to be guaranteed to > > have no regressions (that's my understanding), but since Livezilla isn't in > > the App DB, I don't think the latest stable can guarantee to not regress > > Livezilla. Maybe you should dig up WINE 1.1.39. > > > > Git has versions into the 0.9 region. However, it is an 'exercise for > the student' to do regression testing. Neither Dan nor I have time to > do this for each application that has failed due to a regression. > Thus we ask the reporter to please do so, or find someone who can > properly run a regression. There are hundreds of changes just between > versions and thousands of changes between releases. I would estimate > the number of changes between 1.1.39 and the current release as 1.3.21 > at about 5,000. Fortunately, regression testing using git does not > mean that you have to remove every change to figure out which one > caused the problem. See the Wiki Regression testing page on how to do > this. And the first and most important step is confirming that > LiveZilla works with Wine 1.1.39. > > James McKenzie what's confirming that livezilla works with wine? whoever who confirmed that please pretty please tell me how to do it in steps even million I don't mind what matters is it works
