James McKenzie wrote: > doh123 wrote: > > > I'm not sure LD_LIBRARY_PATH actually does anything on OSX... > > > > there are a lot of related things you can do though... just look at 'man dyld' > > > > > > > Doh123: > > Yes it does. Look it up for FreeBSD. > > Without it, the only directories that will be examined for dynamic > libraries are /usr/lib and /usr/local/lib. Not even /usr/X11/lib will > be looked at (and this should be considered broken for Macs). > > James McKenzie I know it does in BSD... Macs have a DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH that is much more important.
