On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 22:57, came <wineforum-user@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > so cool! > > thanks a lot, gert - that was great help! > > should i still set up this AppDB entry and a bug report? > A bug report with something like "ipconfig.exe not implemented" or "Kinectus needs ipconfig.exe" and the relevant logs, ect for the application makes sense... (it also makes sense to show in the bug report thast the application is only dependant on ipconifg's output and doesn't want to use it to change settings) Read through this wiki page: http://wiki.winehq.org/Bugs people on bugzilla can be somewhat grumpy if you do certain things... The AppDB is a good place to past workarounds like this. Some more things about this hack: It might be a good idea to take the "ipconfig /all" output of one of your systems. (I have a Windows XP in virtualbox, which is where I got that output) The application probably want the MAC address and feeding it another box with the application's MAC address (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MAC_address for background on why the application would want to use that) might result in a license file for that box being usable... (This is where the potential crack part come in..) For applications needing some more output (or performing proper checks on the output) from ipconfig, it might require some more editing. This trick mainly works because Wine allows native applications to run and that making a shell script work as an executable is really easy... Gert