On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 00:40, fernandocarvalho <wineforum-user@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > That was my point. [Exclamation] > I think that wine will be enough when it start running production applications, like MS Office and AutoCAD, and games like Final Fantasy, Starcraft II and others. Have a look at: http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?appId=31 http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=86 (.NET seem to be the main thing messing up recent versions...) (There is also quite a bit of posts on the form / wine-users, use search...) http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=11123 .NET apps should be written to be runnable under Mono.... (The older .NET versions actually seem to have some hope: http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=2586 ) See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mono_%28software%29 > Maybe after this cycle of development in wine, we could focus on increasing compatibility with Visual Studio. "Unmanaged" Visual Studio apps work... .NET (Unfortuanatly, I thing Visual C++ is the only app with an unmanaged option) stuff not... (.NET is huge and require a massive part of Windows to run...) Proper portable .NET apps should be runnable under Mono, which tries to be compliant to the .NET specs... (When they start mixing in non-.NET code, Wine is needed...)
