Sven wrote: > >James Mckenzie wrote: >> Sven: >> >> >> > James Mckenzie wrote: >> > >> > > Sven wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > > This is bug 2666: >> > > > >> > > > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2666 >> > > > >> > > > Patches for this bug were sent a while ago, but they weren't picked up. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > The only patch I found was from 2005. Is there a more recent patch that is not included with the bug report? >> > > >> > > James McKenzie >> > > >> > >> > >> > Yes, those three, applied in this order: >> > >> > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2010-March/086039.html >> > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2010-March/086041.html >> > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2010-March/086042.html >> > >> > >> Thank you for the patches. I'll look in Wine-Devel to see why they were rejected. >Sometimes, AJ states why they were rejected there. His major reason for rejection is that the >patches are 'hacks' that will break functioning of other programs. > >Probably this: > >http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2010-March/082422.html > I remember this exchange of messages. I'll see if there is a follow-on to the work by Vitaly B. James McKenzie
