On 3/16/10 4:51 PM, Adriasil wrote: > Command output: "_alcGetContextsDevice", referenced from: > _wine_alcGetContextsDevice in openal.o > "_alGetInteger", referenced from: > _wine_alGetInteger in openal.o > "_alGetIntegerv", referenced from: > _wine_alGetIntegerv in openal.o > "_alGetSourcefv", referenced from: > _wine_alGetSourcefv in openal.o *exasperated sigh* I told you, your local copy of OpenAL.framework was built *for the wrong architecture*. That is, it was built /64-bit/ instead of /32-bit/. Or, it was built for /PowerPC/ instead of /Intel/. If you want to use that OpenAL with Wine, you *have* to use a /32-bit Intel/ OpenAL. Or, maybe Wine is getting built for the wrong architecture. What does running: file /Library/Frameworks/OpenAL.framework/OpenAL tell you about the OpenAL framework? If it says: /Library/Frameworks/OpenAL.framework/OpenAL: Mach-O 64-bit dynamic library x86_64 or /Library/Frameworks/OpenAL.framework/OpenAL: Mach-O dynamic library ppc then I'm right and your copy was indeed built for the wrong architecture. Chip
