Re: binding to privileged Linux ports (<= 1024)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



oiaohm wrote:
> mc2718  good secuirty is like a onion.   You have layers.
>
> Firewall is only one layer.    DAC permissions are another.   MAC permissions are another.  Physical controls are another.
>
> At the firewall layer I use single packet port knocking to open the ssh.  So it is hidden most of the time.
>
> Also the least number of not security layers the better.  Ie wine is a non secuirty layer.
>
> Always remembering any one layer could fail one day.     Each layer reduces the risk or complete failure.
>
> Secuirty what got my fear of you mc2718.   People from a windows background have the problem of putting too much faith in anti-viruses and firewalls.  Where good secuirty from the Unix/Linux world teaches you not to depend on them.
>
>
>   
Or doing a massive study for the CISSP/IASSP exam.  I have to get this
to keep my job.

In any case, a firewall, with a host based security system can be and is
a lot of fun.

James McKenzie



[Index of Archives]     [Gimp for Windows]     [Red Hat]     [Samba]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Graphics Cards]     [Wine Home]

  Powered by Linux