Re: About Win API Stats

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: About Win API Stats
From: "oiaohm" <wineforum-user@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 04:50:08 -0600
In-reply-to: <1258145197.m2f.34919@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1258145197.m2f.34919@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1258146295.m2f.34923@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx

Really it should die and be integrated into http://test.winehq.org/data/

What is the point of marking a function as implemented if it fails test cases.  None at all.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: About Win API Stats
  - From: Alex

References:
- About Win API Stats
  - From: Alex
- Re: About Win API Stats
  - From: Alex

Prev by Date: Re: Wine 1.1.32 (Kronenberg), .Net 2.0 and MDAC 2.8
Next by Date: "out of range" need for speed
Previous by thread: Re: About Win API Stats
Next by thread: Re: About Win API Stats
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Gimp for Windows] [Red Hat] [Samba] [Yosemite Camping] [Graphics Cards] [Wine Home]

Powered by Linux