Re: Lamaresh.net deb packages vs. self compiled wine-1.1.29

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Lamaresh.net deb packages vs. self compiled wine-1.1.29
From: "vitamin" <wineforum-user@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:20:55 -0500
In-reply-to: <1253641296.m2f.32086@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1253641296.m2f.32086@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1253829009.m2f.32252@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx

boskar wrote:
> the question is why deb packages behave in different way?

You sure they don't have any patches? Lots of packagers add something extra for number of reasons. Vanilla versions usually don't have such patches.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lamaresh.net deb packages vs. self compiled wine-1.1.29
  - From: boskar

References:
- Lamaresh.net deb packages vs. self compiled wine-1.1.29
  - From: boskar
- Re: Lamaresh.net deb packages vs. self compiled wine-1.1.29
  - From: boskar

Prev by Date: Re: World of Warcraft running on one core
Next by Date: Re: Reading Registry of Mounted Disk
Previous by thread: Re: Lamaresh.net deb packages vs. self compiled wine-1.1.29
Next by thread: Re: Lamaresh.net deb packages vs. self compiled wine-1.1.29
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Gimp for Windows] [Red Hat] [Samba] [Yosemite Camping] [Graphics Cards] [Wine Home]

Powered by Linux