Re: Mono for Windows vs. .NET?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Austin English wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:58 PM, walt<w41ter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
>> I just installed a program under wine that says "install Mono for
>> Windows to run .NET programs".
>>
>> My question is, why not just install .NET from winetricks instead?
>> Is this something new?
>>     
>
> You could. .NET used to not install properly, and mono is a free
> implementation, though it may not support all of .NET's features.
>
>   
The 'Install Mono for Windows' will appear if .NET is not installed. 
However, you need to know which version of .NET you need.  .NET 1.1 and
2.0 install well, but do not provide all of the functions needed to
support some programs.  .NET 3.0 and .NET 3.5 are, as far as I know, not
usable yet.

James McKenzie



[Index of Archives]     [Gimp for Windows]     [Red Hat]     [Samba]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Graphics Cards]     [Wine Home]

  Powered by Linux