Freakazo wrote: > Ah all right thanks. > > I just chose a random bug (http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14586) > which installed without problems (though the program still doesn't work). So that bug is fixed, then I added a comment saying that it does. > > Is that how things should be done? Should I add the terminal output when reporting that a bug is fixed or is that only necessary when making a new bug report or confirming that a bug still exists. > Looks fine to me. I don't know what criteria is used by the Wine team (or is it just A. Julliard?) to actually close the bug. I guess, with a bit of look the next wine release will report this bug as fixed/closed. > > And someone said something about doing a trace like this: winedebug=+relay,+seh,+tid wine setup.exe > Is that basically just making the debugger more verbose? Yes, but it should be only relevant when the bug is not fixed.
