Re: Update WINE's 1.0.1 todo list?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:40 PM, James McKenzie
<jjmckenzie51@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Austin English wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:07 AM, James Mckenzie
>> <jjmckenzie51@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Gert van den Berg <wine-users@xxxxxxxxx> at Dec 8, 2008 10:02 PM (MST) wrote about  Update WINE's 1.0.1 todo list?
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:11 PM, AL3X2 <wineforum-user@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think that somebody should update the WINE's TODO list for 1.0.1
>>>>> All the bugs in the list (http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?product=Wine&target_milestone=1.0.1&order=bugs.bug_severity) are closed/fixed.
>>>>>
>>>>>  [Rolling Eyes]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> That might just be because Wine 1.0.1 is released?
>>>>
>>> Just might be.  There should be a Wine 1.0.2 list as well.  I'm guessing there should also be a Wine 1.2 list, too.
>>>
>>
>> Unless Alexandre has changed his mind in the last month or so, no,
>> there shouldn't be. He's not planning on a 1.0.2 update.
>>
>> There *IS* a 1.2 list already.
>>
>>
>>
> Good.  Then the 'old' 1.0.1 list should go and anything left unresolved
> should be moved to 1.2, correct?
>
> James McKenzie
>
>

It should go away, yes, but anything nominated for 1.0.1 should've
BEEN in 1.0.1. 1.0.1 was a stable update, only containing patches that
were already in git and deemed stable. Hence, anything nominated for
1.0.1 already will be in 1.2.0.

-- 
-Austin


[Index of Archives]     [Gimp for Windows]     [Red Hat]     [Samba]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Graphics Cards]     [Wine Home]

  Powered by Linux