On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:40 PM, James McKenzie <jjmckenzie51@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Austin English wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:07 AM, James Mckenzie >> <jjmckenzie51@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Gert van den Berg <wine-users@xxxxxxxxx> at Dec 8, 2008 10:02 PM (MST) wrote about Update WINE's 1.0.1 todo list? >>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:11 PM, AL3X2 <wineforum-user@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think that somebody should update the WINE's TODO list for 1.0.1 >>>>> All the bugs in the list (http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?product=Wine&target_milestone=1.0.1&order=bugs.bug_severity) are closed/fixed. >>>>> >>>>> [Rolling Eyes] >>>>> >>>>> >>>> That might just be because Wine 1.0.1 is released? >>>> >>> Just might be. There should be a Wine 1.0.2 list as well. I'm guessing there should also be a Wine 1.2 list, too. >>> >> >> Unless Alexandre has changed his mind in the last month or so, no, >> there shouldn't be. He's not planning on a 1.0.2 update. >> >> There *IS* a 1.2 list already. >> >> >> > Good. Then the 'old' 1.0.1 list should go and anything left unresolved > should be moved to 1.2, correct? > > James McKenzie > > It should go away, yes, but anything nominated for 1.0.1 should've BEEN in 1.0.1. 1.0.1 was a stable update, only containing patches that were already in git and deemed stable. Hence, anything nominated for 1.0.1 already will be in 1.2.0. -- -Austin
