Austin English <austinenglish@xxxxxxxxx> at Oct 21, 2008 8:16 AM wrote about Re: Bugzilla comment > >On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:01 AM, stimpak <wineforum-user@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> too many UNCO bugs are listed for wine < 1.0 . I suggest purging or archiving the really old ones since they must have been fixed or no-one cares for them atm. Either way they're too confusing! >> >> >> >> >> >> > >Many of them are still valid. I am going through inactive ones to >verify they still exist, and closing non responsive ones. > >I put in a request for volunteers last week. If you've got >time/bandwith to spare, you can help by testing these old bugs: >http://forum.winehq.org/viewtopic.php?t=2565 > >In short: >Upgrade to git/wine 1.1.6. >Look at these bugs: >http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product=Wine&keywords=download&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=days_elapsed&type0-0-0=greaterthan&value0-0-0=180 >Test in a clean WINEPREFIX. >Leave a note in the bug about it. Fixed/still present/blocked by other >bug/busted download link/etc. Austin: Would you also like confirmation/denial on Darwine or would you rather these be confirmed only on Linux? James McKenzie
