if i am correct, Andrwe just wants to get static certain wine dependencies; i'm sure that wineserver and wine could work just well in the way that already wokrs, but whithout dependencies over cups, libc maybe, and other things. you could be more gentle and explain why wine never will be a single binary again instead just say no. since you know much mor than me, be gentle and share your knowledge. 2008/8/8 vitamin <wineforum-user@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Leonardo wrote: > > Andrwe, you could try to ask in the devel list, and also start to hack > the > > cconfigure.ac wine script. > > > > since it's under autotools thing i'm sure that find examples about static > > linking will not be difficult. > > > > i suggest you to ask in wine-devel, but is possible that the ffinal > binary > > becomes amazingly large... > > > You can't package all dlls into one binary. Besides Wine has number of > separate programs that have to be separate. Like wineserver, winedevice, > etc. > > I wish you knew what you were talking about Leonardo, but you don't. > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-users/attachments/20080808/5659e26e/attachment.htm
