On Saturday 17 May 2008 03:58:01 pm ulberon wrote: > Has wine bothered messing with CPU affinity? For instance, binding all > other wine processes and threads to other cores, cores that the > GUI/OpenGL/D3D is not running on? Am I wrong in thinking that the Linux scheduler is smart enough to not assign additional work to a core grinding on something heavy? If not, what benefit would second-guessing the scheduler bring? -- Paul Johnson baloo@xxxxxxxxx Explaination of .pgp part: http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Mail/rant-gpg.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-users/attachments/20080517/a062d4cf/attachment.pgp
