vitamin wrote: > > AndyA wrote: > > I've been digging today, and what I'm trying to work out at the moment is why "ld" won't easly be coaxed into producing a working absolute executable. > > [snipped all irrelevant] > > Because Wine is not a simple library that just can be linked to. Mmm, I'm sure that might sound like Wine is great, and I'm stupid. That's not where I'm coming from at all. I have no gripe against Wine, or the good people that develop and support it. What I'm talking about is GNU ld!
