bussuser skrev:
but Mao the leader of the Unifiedkernel said Unifiedkernel is easier than WINE. because wine is in userspace, to implemente win32 calls it "like to use a high-level language to achieve another high-level language (for example, using Cobol to achieve Fortran)".
More efficient, flexible, and powerful maybe, but "easier" sounds like a bogus argument. In fact, even in his analogy, I'm pretty sure it'd be easier to implement Fortran in Cobol than it'd be to implement it in assembly language. Performance might suffer, of course, but the very point of a high-level language is to make things easy...
