On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Daniel Kasak <dkasak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 20:47 -0700, James McKenzie wrote: > > Paul Johnson wrote: > > > On Thursday 13 March 2008 07:15:31 pm vitamin wrote: > > >> I think you did not get that. Ok for those in the tank I'll repeat: NO > > >> ATTACHMENTS OF ANY KIND! If you can not configure your client to not attach > > >> useless stuff - then change client. > > > Better idea: Fix the list to comply with RFC 4880. > > No. There is another RFC about attachements sent to mailing lists. > > Comply with that one. > > Cool. An RFC fight. Let me get my popcorn ... > > -- > Daniel Kasak > IT Developer > NUS Consulting Group > Level 5, 77 Pacific Highway > North Sydney, NSW, Australia 2060 > T: (+61) 2 9922-7676 / F: (+61) 2 > 9922 7989 > email: dkasak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > website: > http://www.nusconsulting.com.au > > > > Haha, man Paul is always in the most entertaining threads. I do enjoy reading them
