Thanks for that info. So it isn't an error, just a mistake from me. Cheers Rico Detlef Riekenberg wrote: > On Sa, 2007-12-22 at 15:04 +0100, Rico Schüller wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I wrote a small windows program (msgbox.exe) and run it like that: >> WINEDEBUG=+heap wine msgbox.exe. In the output there is the memory at >> address 0x110118 allocated more than once without a free. It is shown in >> the "output" (I snipped out a lot of unnecessary stuff). > > Your trace is incomplete: > > WINEDEBUG=+heap,+tid wine msgbox.exe > > The virtual address is the same, but the allocation is for a different > process. > > WINEDEBUG=+heap,+tid,+process wine msgbox.exe > > The second Process is "explorer.exe" > _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
