John Drescher wrote: >> Windows .NET programs are usually linked to some native dlls or >> something. In my experience, they don't usually run on Linux Mono. >> >> Kevin N. >> >> They can be properly written using .NET classes and linked to .NET >> libraries... >> thus working without problem. >> >> > One reason for using native dlls is performance. In cases where an > emulated virtual environment provides poor performance a native dll > can be added to improve performance. > Better performance should NEVER be a reason to use native .dll files. Implementing a function that is NOT available through Wine, is. However, you should NEVER replace a core dll with a native version unless you want trouble. I would rather that the development team continue to implement functions and sometimes break some of the functions of Wine than to replace Wine dlls with native ones as a workaround. James _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
