Re: Re: Difference Between WINE and an Emulator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



James Hawkins wrote:
On 12/8/06, Alan McKinnon <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Friday 08 December 2006 13:48, Jens Gulden wrote:
> WINE is an operating-system running in user-space. It smashes the
> usual dichotomy "a piece of software is either an operating system or
> an application". WINE is _both_ an OS _and_ an application. At first
> sight a joke for computer-scientists, but probably the most ingenious
> idea in the history of software-development yet...

Not only that but it's also a truly astounding piece of
reverse-engineering.


Wine was not developed using reverse engineering...that would be illegal.

I don't thing the statement regarding reverse engineering being illegal is strictly true, it depends on the circumstances, why your doing it, what your doing it on and under which countries Law's your talking about.. Quoted from Wikipedia which gives not only wine but also samba & openoffice as examples. As I understand it reverse engineering is considered fair use (as long as you don't copy the code or circumvent restrictions) you just study it to determine how it works then implement your representation. It also depends which continent your on. Here's a nice explanation from a European patent & copyright company.

http://www.jenkins-ip.com/serv/serv_6.htm

Strangely European law is stricter about reverse engineering than US Law which I find surprising. You don't think Microsoft reverse engineer (study somebody else products to try to figure out how they work) when the need arises ?

"This process is sometimes termed /Reverse Code Engineering/ or RCE. As an example, decompilation of binaries for the Java platform can be accomplished using ArgoUML . One famous case of reverse engineering was the first non-IBM implementation of BIOS which launched the historic PC clone industry.

In the United States , the Digital Millennium Copyright Act exempts from the circumvention ban some acts of reverse engineering aimed at interoperability of file formats and protocols, but judges in key cases have ignored this law, since it is acceptable to circumvent restrictions for use, but not for access. Aside from restrictions on circumvention, reverse engineering of software is protected in the U.S. by the fair use exception in copyright law.

The Samba software, which allows systems that are not running Microsoft Windows systems to share files with systems that are, is a classic example of software reverse engineering, since the Samba project had to reverse-engineer unpublished information about how Windows file sharing worked, so that non-Windows computers could emulate it. The Wine project does the same thing for the Windows API, and OpenOffice.org is one party doing this for the Microsoft Office file formats."

_______________________________________________
wine-users mailing list
wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gimp for Windows]     [Red Hat]     [Samba]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Graphics Cards]     [Wine Home]

  Powered by Linux