Hiji wrote: > Were you able to compile 0.9.13 just fine? I had no problem with 0.9.13. it is installed now; (I uninstalled it to do the 0.9.14 build/install however.), then reinstalled it for now. I don't know how the parameter in the macro call in baseshader.c should be declared. I assume that would be sufficient. > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: David Dawson <gobble_em_up@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 1:01:04 PM > Subject: Wine 0.9.14.compile error (fatal) > > Tried to compile the lastest wine and gcc choked up on it as follows: > > gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -I/usr/X11R6/include > -D__WINESRC__ -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing > -gstabs+ -Wpointer-arith > -g -O2 -o baseshader.o baseshader.c > baseshader.c: In function `print_glsl_info_log': > baseshader.c:688: error: `GL_OBJECT_INFO_LOG_LENGTH_ARB' undeclared (first > use in this function) > baseshader.c:688: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > baseshader.c:688: error: for each function it appears in.) > make[2]: *** [baseshader.o] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/wine-0.9.14/dlls/wined3d' > make[1]: *** [wined3d] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/wine-0.9.14/dlls' > make: *** [dlls] Error 2 > > > Any ideas? Small patch? > Thanks > If you wrestle in the mud with a pig. > you both get dirty, and the pig likes it. > > -- Dave Dawson > _______________________________________________ > wine-users mailing list > wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users -- If you wrestle in the mud with a pig. you both get dirty, and the pig likes it. -- Dave Dawson _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
