Re: what is faster: wine20041019 or 0.9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthew L Reed wrote:
> My understanding is that amule is not being currently maintained, and I like
> eMule. I could be easily persuaded to run a native ed2k client if I could
> find a good one, do you (or anyone else here) know of any?

mldonkey as already mentioned, kmldonkey is a pretty decent GUI for it.

My personal experience running emule with recent wine is that:
 * Graphics is not repainted correctly when moving/resizing etc.
 * It will die half an hour after being started with a heap exception.

_______________________________________________
wine-users mailing list
wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users


[Index of Archives]     [Gimp for Windows]     [Red Hat]     [Samba]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Graphics Cards]     [Wine Home]

  Powered by Linux