Le lundi 31 octobre 2005 à 15:48 +0000, dan a écrit : > Have you tred IEs 4 linux? > > http://www.tatanka.com.br/ies4linux/ > > <quote> > IEs for Linux is a simple Bash Script program that installs Internet > Explorer 6, 5.5 and 5 on Linux using Wine. The whole process is > automatic and very easy. > </quote> > > The only problem I had was the long download time...! IE6, 5.5, and 5 > all work fine, no problems at all. You can take a look at IE's AppDB entry it has all these informations and even more: http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?versionId=469 > > On 31/10/05, Olive <olive.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > What I don't understand is that I think that all change made by > > codeweavers to the wine libraries are covered by the LGPL licence, so I > > ask the question why wine can't just work as good as crossover. > > > > Olive > > > > If wine worked as good as crossover, crossover would be out of > business. And I dont think they put all their changes back into wine; > if they do why would they publish a list of contributions? > > http://www.codeweavers.com/about/community/contributions/ > Please don't speak about things that you don't know about. Crossover office's source code is available for everyone: http://www.codeweavers.com/products/source/ Most people working on Wine are paid by Crossover and most patches are first sent to Wine and then only integrated in Crossover. The difference between Wine and Crossover is that Crossover has a list of supported applications and thus accept workarounds and dirty hacks to make these application work where Wine only accept code that look correct. You will find that (maybe) more applications work under Wine than Crossover but that Crossover is more good at making the supported applications work. -- Jonathan Ernst <Jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
