On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 09:52:29AM -0700, drescher0110-lists@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > But this discussion leaves me wondering (seriously, > > I am not trolling) > > why you want to use a non-ANSI compliant compiler. > > Other than 1) > > "Corporate told me I had to.", 2) "That's what the > > customers > > specified.", or 3) "To maintain legacy code." :-) > 3) I have 500K lines of code that I need to support > that was written for VC6 and porting it will take > months of my time as I spent two weeks a couple of > years ago to begin this only to give up becuase I did > not have the time... Yeah, I thought so. Sigh. I just looked: I have VC++ 6.0, which I bought some time in 1997-9. I should have figured. Thanks. -- Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB
Attachment:
pgp0fyLxk6WMP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
