Re: june 2005 release and 'registry' ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks... I don't mind change but I prefer it to be forward. In my opinion only: wine is not a windows application so that it needs to use the registry and the registry sucks as far as maintainability. My .wine/config had 232 lines and most of them were comments, things were well organized and easy to find. If I export my registry via regedit I have over 6000 lines with NO comments and this is with NO MS-Windows applications installed. I have looked for my config file keys and they just are not in the registry. Is there a document in CVS someplace that I can read to better inform me on these changes and what to add or change in the registry to get wine configured how it used to be for me (other than grepping the source code looking for every registry query and trying to puzzle it out?) I have looked for this document also and not found one but hey; I can walk right by something that I am looking for in the hardware store and not see it there either.

Thanks.
Pete

James Hawkins wrote:

On 7/9/05, Peter Birch <plbirch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There are a very large number of options that were in the config file
that are not in winecfg.  Some of these options made a big difference as
far as performance went for some of the applications I use.


These options can be altered using regedit.

_______________________________________________
wine-users mailing list
wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gimp for Windows]     [Red Hat]     [Samba]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Graphics Cards]     [Wine Home]

  Powered by Linux