Hi Duane, Many thanks for your help - I hadn't discovered all these errata - indeed, I thought there were no errata provided now for RH9 as it's no longer supported (as I've discovered since I bought it!). Best regards, Andy On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 18:58, Duane Clark wrote: > Andy Allen wrote: > > Joachim, apologies again for bothering you, > > but after I sent the email below, I managed to link Xdialog in /usr/bin > > to /usr/local/Winetools to get Winetools to work (I'm still getting used > > to the 'peculiarities' of linux!). I went through the Base Setup > > procedure as advised, and it seemed to work 'mostly OK', but I think > > there is a problem with my glibc as you advised - a couple of things: > > Should I be able to see the fake Windows drive > > /home/andrew/.wine/drive_c with Nautilus? > > Can you detect anything wrong with GLIBC from the stuff below? > > > > Best regards, > > Andrew > > > > Drive C: is /home/andrew/.wine/drive_c, links will be made for c > > fake_windows > > waiting for wineservers to exit... > > all wineservers endet after 0 seconds... > > /usr/bin/wineserver: relocation error: /usr/bin/wineserver: symbol > > epoll_create, version GLIBC_2.3.2 not defined in file libc.so.6 with > > link time reference > > detecting Wine version... done. > > This is expected with the Wine RPMs when used with RH9 without errata > applied. To eliminate the problem, either compile Wine against your own > system, or better, apply the glibc errata (along with other important > ones such as kernel errata). > > http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh9-errata.html > > _______________________________________________ > wine-users mailing list > wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users