Mark Knecht wrote: >On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 08:10:52 +1100, Shayne O'Connor ><forums@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >>hi mark, thanx for the info .... however, the quartz.dll didn't seem to >>help :( >> >> >> >>> Searching on my XP Pro box there is a copy in system32 so it you >>>were to try putting it there then it might be interesting to see what >>>it does. >>> >>> > > > >>i also put it in the /system/ folder - that is where the included .nfo >>file suggests to put it ... >> >> > >Yeah, it would have been luck if it worked. I just found with the >newest VST stuff that putting the required dll's in the directory tha >the VST was in worked i that case. > >I suspect that quartz really isn't the solution however and more work >with it will just be wasted time... > > > > > > >>> Now, if it's not quartz.dll then you have to run the wine debugger >>>to figure out what's being called when the menu is drawn incorrectly. >>>I tried that and didn't get anywhere. >>> >>> >>> >>i'll give this a shot - i haven't been able to find a good debugging >>how-to for wine ... any suggestions? >> >> > >Well, the Wine Userr's guide gives some good instructions but you need >to be pretty interested in learning before you delve in. > >http://www.winehq.com/site/docs/wine-user/bugs > >You can learn about debug channels in other parts of the same >document. It's interesting (sort of...) that all this capability is >there, but also frustrating as it feels like you have to get a >programming degree to even get started. > > > yeah, i might put that journey on hold for the meantime :) >One other possibility, which I don't think will work in this case, is >that IF you can find a version of Wine that work differently in this >regard then you can start looking at when changes happened that >effected your program. I did this on the VST stuff and that lead to a >couple of very helpful and much more knowledgeable people jumping in >and find a hack to fix something. The good side about that hack is a >better version is now being included in the next version of jack_fst >and it will be FAR easier for others to fun VSTs under Linux in the >future. Clearly Wavelab, Reaktor and lots of other high-end windows >audio apps are wanted by the community. If we can find some of these >answers then it helps everyone. > > > i can do without the menu entries for the moment, as everything else works, and i sort of know my way around, but yeah - at the moment i haven't been able to test out the stuff like Audio Montage (which is basically a multi-track recorder) or CD tools, because that is where the menu options require more than intuitiveness (for me at least). everything else seems to work in wavelab - if *all* it's features worked, and the program ran as it did under windows ... well, it's quite an impressive app! >Did you earlier point out a demo version of Wavelab that shows this >problem? I'd be willing to try a quick install to see if I can >duplicate your results. > > > there should be a link to the demo version on this page: http://www.steinberg.net/displaydoc_sb.asp?Product_id=2181&Langue_ID=7&doctype=243&templ=10&division_id=&loc=doc243 shayne _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users