It all boils down to a question of common sense. If a comment is made to the subject line in general, TOP POSTING is the better way. I f the comment is made to specific points, then INTERSPERSED POSTING is preferred. If a comment is made to the overall context, then BOTTOM POSTING *might* be better. Bottom postings are *most annoying* when responding to a longwinded text by just saying one or two words, or a short sentence with little or no substance. People who insist of applying fixed rules are usually laking common sense. But as always, there are exceptions :-) John On Monday 20 December 2004 02:43 am, Fabian Cenedese wrote: > >>Depends on who's doing the reading. I prefer mine interleaved like this! > > > >It's just a different way of bottom posting, because you refer to > > something written above. > > One of the best explanations: > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is it such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? > > :) > > bye Fabi > > > _______________________________________________ > wine-users mailing list > wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
