On November 9, 2004 09:58 am, Mark Knecht wrote: > That looks like a good start to me. > > Sill, there could be file locking issues to deal with also if foo trys > to use what bar is playing with at the same time, correct? He really > needs some other process to send foo a message telling him what's > going on... True. Especially since the smbfs mount will not handle the file locking (unless that has changed without me noticing). He would be better using nfs to do the mounting if file locking is an issue. However he did originally say that he was going to depend upon his own self-control for preventing conflict. > > > On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:56:02 -0800, Bill Medland > > <billmedland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On November 9, 2004 08:42 am, Mark Knecht wrote: > > > Who owns the files on the dosdrive? foo? bar? Some group that foo and > > > bar belong to? Are group and ownder permissions identical? > > > > Oh yes. I forgot about that issue. Use a wine group and chmod +2775 on > > the shared directories, with the wine group for all the files and > > directories. > > > > > > > > -- > > Bill Medland > > mailto:billmedland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed -- Bill Medland mailto:billmedland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
