On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 11:05, Ivan wrote: > For those of you who don't know yet, the Wine project has it's own seti@home > team, at > http://setiathome2.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_172471.html > The current objective is to overtake the Microsoft team > http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_28.html > Help is needed, please if you already have seti@home installed. > If you don't, it's only 300k to download, runs natively on any unix platform. i hear ya about needing to defeat micro$oft wherever possible, but shouldn't it be done in a meaningful manner? i think that for wine to be an integral part of this attempt, there should be the added stipulation of having to run the windows seti client under wine; not just running the native unix client (wouldn't there perhaps be a unix team with your same goals, and they *are* going to be using the native client - why should the wine team be redundant of the unix team?). I already know that the unix client is far superior to the windows one, as i have been a seti@home participant for a while now... (http://setiathome2.ssl.berkeley.edu/fcgi-bin/fcgi?email=vertigo%40specialagent420.com&cmd=user_stats_new) _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
