> Of course you can, the API is not completely different, it's > basically > identical except that the call sequence of the pcm functions has > changed; this doesn't justify duplicating the whole file. In fact it > seems simply defining the ALSA_PCM_OLD_* macros would work just as > well. Is this second attempt better ? (not tested with alsa 0.9) changelog : add alsa 1.0 support to winealsa ===== Sylvain Petreolle (spetreolle_at_users_dot_sourceforge_dot_net) ICQ #170597259 Say NO to software patents Dites NON aux brevets logiciels "What if tomorrow the War could be over ?" Morpheus, in "Reloaded". ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
Attachment:
patch2.diff
Description: patch2.diff
