Jeremy, it looks like the patches to wwn/wn20010611_97.xml and
wwn/wn20010718_100.xml did not take last time. Can you look into this?
It looks like they're the only two modified files with CR/LFs. Maybe
it's
related. I'm resubmiting them as part of this patch.
Changelog:
* templates/en/status_dlls.template,
wwn/wn20010611_97.xml,
wwn/wn20010718_100.xml,
wwn/interviews/interview_12.xml
Assorted spelling and case fixes
--
Francois Gouget fgouget@free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/
RFC 2549: ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2549.txt
IP over Avian Carriers with Quality of Service
Index: templates/en/status_dlls.template
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/lostwages/templates/en/status_dlls.template,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -r1.11 status_dlls.template
--- templates/en/status_dlls.template 3 Oct 2003 22:01:58 -0000 1.11
+++ templates/en/status_dlls.template 5 Oct 2003 22:04:03 -0000
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
</tr>
<tr>
<td>odbc32: ODBC Database Manager</td>
- <td class="adequate"><a href="http://www.winehq.org/Docs/wine-user/odbc.shtml";>Winehq ODBC Docs</a><br>
+ <td class="adequate"><a href="http://www.winehq.org/Docs/wine-user/odbc.shtml";>WineHQ ODBC Docs</a><br>
<a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vccore98/html/_core_odbc.asp";>MSDN: ODBC</a></td>
<td><a href="?issue=115#ODBC%20and%20Wine">#115</a>,
<a href="?issue=167#Accessing%20ODBC%20Databases">#167</a></td>
Index: wwn/wn20010611_97.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/lostwages/wwn/wn20010611_97.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.5 wn20010611_97.xml
--- wwn/wn20010611_97.xml 25 Jul 2003 18:45:03 -0000 1.5
+++ wwn/wn20010611_97.xml 13 Sep 2003 10:46:12 -0000
@@ -17,11 +17,11 @@
floppy drive crashes, and very nearly some mountain bike crashes it's
been an exciting week. </p>
-<p>Last week Codeweavers announced support for Windows browser plug-ins by using Wine.
+<p>Last week CodeWeavers announced support for Windows browser plug-ins by using Wine.
A nice little article can be found at
<a href="http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=5463";>
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=5463</a>. In particular
-it mentions support for Quicktime and Shockwave Director and the ability to use this
+it mentions support for QuickTime and Shockwave Director and the ability to use this
in an embedded environment. </p>
<p>In the CVS tree, work is continuing on improved window manager support, various
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@
comments. We will be spending the rest of the day getting the initial
category structure and 1st round off applications in. Once we have
enough input, and we fell stable enough, I will link the AppDB to
-Winehq.com and post to wine-users.</p>
+WineHQ.com and post to wine-users.</p>
<p><a href="http://appdb.winehq.com/";>http://appdb.winehq.com/</a></p>
Index: wwn/wn20010718_100.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/lostwages/wwn/wn20010718_100.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.2 wn20010718_100.xml
--- wwn/wn20010718_100.xml 12 Jun 2003 20:48:20 -0000 1.2
+++ wwn/wn20010718_100.xml 19 Jul 2003 15:42:18 -0000
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@
<p>Lionel Ulmer replied:</p>
<quote who="Lionel Ulmer"><p>
-My first question was : why implement it ? I would personnaly find VERY
+My first question was : why implement it ? I would personally find VERY
annoying to have any Windows app. change the size of my desktop window when
I prefer running my applications 'windowed'.</p>
Index: wwn/interviews/interview_12.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/lostwages/wwn/interviews/interview_12.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 interview_12.xml
--- wwn/interviews/interview_12.xml 3 Oct 2003 22:19:15 -0000 1.1
+++ wwn/interviews/interview_12.xml 6 Oct 2003 14:10:23 -0000
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
I did like working on the DirectPlay stuff, it's too bad that the
interaction between the DirectPlayLobby and DirectPlay stuff wasn't
documented. It appears that they've at least changed their ways in that
-regard, but there are still several layers of interation which are not
+regard, but there are still several layers of interaction which are not
documented so one would just have to go with a monolithic black box
approach rather than exactly duplicating each of their dlls.
</p></answer>
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@
<answer><p><i>Peter:</i> Headaches and sleepless nights :( TransGaming
solved the issue in the same way that was done for the NPTL - embrace the
fact that we couldn't override errno and use pthreads. TransGaming dusted
-off our old pthreads implementation that we had donated to Winehq, and
+off our old pthreads implementation that we had donated to WineHQ, and
basically extended it so that it would work on both LinuxThreads - Wine
does a runtime binary patch rather than using pthreads in this situation -
and with NPTL without the user having to configure differently. They are,
@@ -316,11 +316,11 @@
<answer><p><i>Peter:</i>
The portions which represent our core technologies are incredibly
different. Other areas depend on the volume of change on both sides. With
-every Winehq and WineX patch they diverge a little more since relatively
+every WineHQ and WineX patch they diverge a little more since relatively
few people license their code for the ReWind project which is how we
donate and receive patches. Another issue with ReWind patches is that
often X11 patches depend on functionality of LGPL patches, so ReWind is
-not able to use them until the patch is availble with an X11 license or a
+not able to use them until the patch is available with an X11 license or a
different patch with equivalent functionality is available. Another
problem is that many LGPL patches are made to code we contributed so those
improvements never come back. This just ends up making it more difficult
