Re: The Opposite of Windows-Free Wine?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Maybe you should consider VMWare, even though its commercial, it gives
that optimal performance for Windows environment on UNIX


./Joe

On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 21:22, Kevin Kleinfelter wrote:
> Are there any FAQs or HowTos on setting up the opposite of a Windows-Free 
> Wine?
> 
> In other words, if I've got a Windows CD, and I'm willing to use as much of 
> it with Wine as is optimal, what would I do?  'Optimal' means 'as fully 
> Windows compatible as possible.'  I'm willing to use Win98/ME/2K/XP, 
> whichever is most likely to give me a Wine environment that will run as 
> many common Windows apps as possible.
> 
> (If the answer is RTFM at WineHQ, I could really use a pointer, because I 
> can't find it.)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> wine-users mailing list
> wine-users@winehq.com
> http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-users


_______________________________________________
wine-users mailing list
wine-users@winehq.com
http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gimp for Windows]     [Red Hat]     [Samba]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Graphics Cards]     [Wine Home]

  Powered by Linux