On Sun, 8 Dec 2002 12:34:33 +0100 (CET) "Sylvain Petreolle" <spetreolle@yahoo.fr> wrote: > He isnt joking, and this UK site writings are All Lies. This is only a > way to have less work to do for the web people. > IE is less secure than mozilla at many points. > > > Send an email to your bank saying they are doing something non > > > standard. It may be that Mozilla is not a "supported" browser but > > it > > > should work with any standards complient web sites > > > (banking sites have no reason to not follow the standards). > > > > > > I use Mozilla to do my online banking. > > > > > > > You have got to be joking. At least one UK site has code to refuse > > anything other than IE on the grounds that the others 'are not > > secure'. > Clearly I should have added "</sarcasm>" at the end. Having monitored bugtraq for over a year I have a fair idea just how bad IE (and lookout) are for security. Actually the bank in question run all their systems on NT and have done for a long time, so there is reason to suspect that the IT manager is a MS shareholder. _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@winehq.com http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
