From: "Patrick Tighe" <ptighe@detroit.faurecia.com>We've been switching over to OO from MS and you're right, there are about 5% of documents that have some problems, but given the ROI, we think its worth a few extra labor hours. Also, most of the time you can find a slighty different way of the making the document and let your supplier know how to change it, and you're both happy. The multiplication problem is probably caused because someone got lazy and used a cell reference when they should have used a variable. Checkboxes seem to work fine on mine though. Personally, I think its worth a little hassle to be able to have the same word processor on both platforms. Of course, if your company has some heavy macro users, you may have to stick with M$ products.
I can make a certain case for absolutely not. Myself, I'm considering
strongly going back to Windows for work, I've run into too many >instances where OO has not given me the correct info. this is very >important when I'm looking at a quote from a supplier, and the fields >with multiplication are not multiplied. Also, checkboxes don't come >across, and I'm sure there are others. While I believe Linux to be >the superior OS, I don't believe Star Office, or Open Office are up to >the level of MS Office.
Chris Berry
compjma@hotmail.com
Systems Administrator
JM Associates
"And here in our server room you can see our Beowolf Cluster of C64's that keeps our enterprise on the very cutting edge of technology."
_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
_______________________________________________
wine-users mailing list
wine-users@winehq.com
http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
