Well, now that we're up to date with the public tree, I've been trying to be the "Lawson" for office. That's a hefty job though, so I'm enlisting the help of our qa dept in entering bugs into bugs.winehq.com. On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:47:31PM -0500, Jeremy White wrote: > > > > I agree with Andi. Too much useless, redundant data. If you have an > > issue with Wine, submit it to Bugzilla (bugs.winehq.com). Bugzilla is > > where Wine bugs belong. The AppDB has to only answer a few simple > > questions. "Does my app work?" and "How well does my app work?". > ... > > I wanted to bring up one enhancement that many people I've > talked to feel would be a very important improvement to > the appdb: get more 'Lawsons'. > > The idea is if we can get someone to do for each app in the > appdb what Lawson does for Juno, then I believe that Wine > will truly start to fly. > > So, I guess the concept is sort of an 'owner', or maybe a > team of owners for each app. An ideal owner would be someone > who: > a) Uses the app everyday. > b) Uses the app fairly broadly and depends on it. > c) Is willing to periodically try CVS builds of Wine > and to report regressions. > > Further, if we can get an owner for each app who actually > uses it, then I think that person would get the opportunity > to rate it, and their rating would weigh more heavily than > all the other comments. > > Jer > > > > -- michael cardenas lead windows compatibility engineer lindows.com "Be the change you want to see in the world" -Mahatma Gandhi _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@winehq.com http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
