On Thu, 2 May 2002, Tony Lambregts wrote: > So this is what I have come up with. > > 1. Installation (total possible 2) [...] > 12. Date tested. Verison of wine used With the proviso that having multiple categories tends to favour "average-looking" results, the system looks good. I would also include the license under which the software is available. Without wishing to reigniting the wine-license debate :) the license could be one of: "free w/ sourcecode", "free but binary only", "commercial", "Donno, got it off a mate". > Idealy we would be able to look at the AppDB and list all programs that > have problems with any of the criteria Yes. Also, it would be nice if you could search the db for applications that have a certain range of points (or stars), rather than just >= x, for example to look for all four-star applications. > Probably the most usefull aspect of this is that it gives users and > developers a real way of measuring how well wine really is doing and > where problems that affect the most programs are. Hmm, there was always the possibility of this, but I think any half-way reliable estimate would require retesting working apps; or do you assume no regression in functionality? What do you think? ---- Paul Millar _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@winehq.com http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
