On Sun, 8 Jul 2001 17:40:03 -0400, eikelan@gmx.net (Eike Lantzsch) wrote: >Hi: > >Like Gerard Patel mentioned on the developer's list I can confirm >that Wine's behaviour _is_ now very dependant on which X server >is used and to top it: It has always been dependant, in fact. I feel that it's more the case now - in part because there are quite a few unresolved glitches yet. >also this behaviour is varying quite a bit >depending on the Windows application which is run. >I have font problems with XF86_SVGA on a Trident Video-107PCI >(cheapy-cheapy) and not with XF86_S3 on a Diamond 2000 3D (old). >The problem was mentioned here already (EmHeight=3xBodyHeight). You mean inappropriate fonts choice ? I don't quite remember this emheight problem. What I have seen is that on a computer with access to Windows fonts things are going a lot smoothier than on a no-windows computer. >Also there are windows (especially listboxes) problems with >16bit applications on the SVGA but not on the S3 X server. >At least no show-stoppers. >I hope this will get better as soon as I can install XF86 4.1x > >It seems that Wine development will get far more tedious now >with the recent patches to windows management. How many different >X servers can a developer install and perform tests on? I have 2 computers, one with Xfree 3.3.6, the other with 4.0.3. Many remaining problems are similar on the 2 computers, so I'm trying to solve these first. Gerard _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@winehq.com http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
